CustomPC Media Benchmarks

Download from: www.custompc.co.uk/benchmarks

Custom PC, bit-tech's sister magazine, has developed its own Media Benchmarks to simulate the tasks that most of us perform on a regular basis. There are three tests, each of which measure different aspects of a PC's performance.

You can download the suite from the link above, and submit your score to the benchmark leaderboard to see how your PC compares with those of others.

GIMP Image Editing


GIMP Image Editing

CustomPC Benchmark

  • Core 2 Duo E7400 (2x4.2GHz, 1,600MHz FSB)
  • Pentium Dual Core E5200 (2x4.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Phenom II X2 550 BE (2x3.8GHz, 2.6GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon II X2 250 (2x3.9GHz, 2.4GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E7400 (2x2.8GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Phenom II X2 550 BE (2x3.1GHz, 2.0GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon X2 7850 BE (2x3.1GHz, 2.0GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon II X2 250 (2x3.0GHz, 2.0GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Pentium Dual Core E5200 (2x2.5GHz, 800MHz FSB)
  • Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.4GHz, 1.1GHz HTT)
  • Athlon X2 7850 BE (2x2.7GHz, 1.8GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.1GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • 242
  • 270
  • 303
  • 309
  • 353
  • 375
  • 395
  • 398
  • 421
  • 426
  • 436
  • 452
0
100
200
300
400
500
Seconds - lower is better

In image editing both the Intel CPUs have a clear advantage over the X2 550 BE, with a significant 25 and 12 percent performance advantage for the E7400 and E5200 respectively. The Phenom II X2 550 BE is only a few seconds faster than the Athlon II X2 250 as well, and is only 16.5 percent faster than the E7400 at stock clocks. The X2 550 BE is a clear improvement to what has gone before from AMD, however it's still the Intel CPUs that command the advantage.

Handbrake x.264 Video Encoding


Handbreak x.264 Video Encoding

CustomPC Benchmark

  • Core 2 Duo E7400 (2x4.2GHz, 1,600MHz FSB)
  • Pentium Dual Core E5200 (2x4.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
  • Phenom II X2 550 BE (2x3.8GHz, 2.6GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon II X2 250 (2x3.9GHz, 2.4GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom II X2 550 BE (2x3.1GHz, 2.0GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon II X2 250 (2x3.0GHz, 2.0GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon X2 7850 BE (2x3.1GHz, 2.0GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E7400 (2x2.8GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.4GHz, 1.1GHz HTT)
  • Athlon X2 7850 BE (2x2.7GHz, 1.8GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Pentium Dual Core E5200 (2x2.5GHz, 800MHz FSB)
  • Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.1GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
  • 546
  • 552
  • 592
  • 593
  • 720
  • 747
  • 760
  • 761
  • 807
  • 837
  • 855
  • 865
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Seconds - lower is better

Again the Intel CPUs stretch out an 7-8 percent lead over the X2 550 BE, with it only a second faster than the much cheaper Athlon II X2 250 as well. Clearly L3 cache and memory performance makes little difference here, as both give way to core clock speed performance.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04